The very idea of searching for the "right job" is wrong to begin with── Aptitude isn't determined before you enter a job, but after you start doing it.

I took the career aptitude test three times. Every time, a different job category came up. None of them felt right.

I read a self-analysis book, took stock of my past experiences, and wrote down my strengths. The notebook was filled, but it didn't give me any answers. Instead, the more I wrote, the more I was left with the feeling that I was getting closer to the conclusion that "I have nothing."

This impasse is not happening because of a lack of effort. There is a distortion in how the question was framed from the very beginning.

── 「SuitabilityThe Hidden Assumptions Behind the Question "What is Work?"

The phrase "looking for a job that suits you" contains two unstated premises. One is the premise that a fixed aptitude already exists within oneself. The other is the premise that a job corresponding to that aptitude actually exists somewhere.

In other words, this question is built on the mindset of searching for a key and a keyhole. You view yourself as a key with a fixed shape, and somewhere out there is a matching hole. Therefore, as long as you don't fit, you assume that your search method is flawed or that your understanding of your own shape is lacking.

However, humans do not have a single shape like a key.

A person is made not of a single talent, but of a bundle of multiple functions.

Rationality, artistry, empathy, physical sensation, social skills, linguistic ability, and abstraction. People are born with multiple capacities like these. Some are visible, while others have never been activated and remain unknown even to the individuals themselves.

All of these have a structure of "there is an input, and there is an output." In other words, they are functions. And human output does not manifest as just one of these, but rather as a totality in which multiple functions are bundled together with weights.

── The output is not determined solely by the function.

This becomes a crucial turning point. A function by itself outputs nothing. What comes out changes depending on what is inputted. When the same person starts acting like a completely different person the moment their environment changes, it is not because their personality has changed. It is because the input has changed.

The idea of trying to determine "whether you are suited for it" before entering the environment ignores this structure. Since you are trying to predict the output without giving any input, there is no way it could be accurate.

The order is rearranged after entering the environment.

Going a step further, the structure is even more dynamic. The sets of functions that people possess have priorities, and their order is not fixed. When the environment changes, roles change, and the way things are perceived changes fundamentally, terms that had previously sunk to the lower levels leap to the main axis. It is not a mere shift in values, but a reorganization of the functional structure itself.

The triggers for reorganization are mostly set. When the way things look changes. When placed in a new role or situation. When going through a major event like a loss or a leap forward. When deeply involved with a specific person. And when the reality of a future that has not yet arrived becomes thicker.

What they all have in common is that it does not happen in internal analysis.

So, even if you keep analyzing yourself at your desk, the arrangement won't change. Because you are observing it while it remains still, no matter how many times you diagnose it, you just go round and round in the same circles.

── A life that seems to take the long way around may be a continuous series of rearrangements.

Some people change their order easily, while others find it hard to do so. Those who adapt easily respond quickly to environmental changes, connecting unexpected elements together to create things that are unexpected. However, life does not move in a straight line; it draws a spiral. Because their order gets out of sync with those around them, it may look like a detour at first glance, and turbulence is more likely to occur, along with a sense of loneliness.

Those who struggle to move maintain their initial structure for a long time. They deeply immerse themselves in a single environment, adhere to a specific aesthetic, and reach a localized completion through accumulation. This is not inferiority; it is a different kind of intensity.

It is not a question of which is better. What is being questioned is whether one is in a state of being able to observe for oneself which tendency one has.

Not knowing what job is right for you is not a defect. In many cases, it simply means you haven't received enough input yet.

So I change my input. Standing on-site where I've never been, engaging with types of people I've never spoken to, and taking on roles I've never done. Looking back after the sequence of events has shifted, I realize that the judgment "it suited me" could only ever be made after the fact.

Aptitude is not something you find. It is something you build.

↓ To learn more, check out Corridor θ I "Theory of Immanent Functions" right now ↓

↓Related articles are here↓

↓ Latest articles are here ↓