What a "charismatic person" truly possesses: The paradox of weak ego, not a strong one

「Charismatic personWhen you hear the word "[ ]", who do you think of?

Charisma. Overwhelming confidence. Clear vision. Unwavering conviction. Leadership.

In the context of self-development, charisma is defined asThe effects of a strong egois depicted as.

However, when you observe genuinely charismatic people, you see a different structure.

Weber's definition and its limitations

German sociologist Max Weber defined charisma as "Superhuman and exceptional innate talentsdefined as

A third authority, neither rational-legal nor traditional authority. A power that emanates not from the force of laws or institutions, but from the person's very existence. Weber calls this in modern society "Irrational nuclearpositioned as

Weber's definition remains influential, but there's a problem.

That is,I tried to explain the structure of charisma as "strength." It is.

Why quiet people change the atmosphere

Think about it from your own experience.

People who are loud, assertive, and pushy. They seem to have "strong egos." However, that doesn't necessarily mean people are attracted to them. Instead, one might feel drained by them or want to keep their distance.

Conversely, people who are truly attractive often It's quiet.There's no pushiness. Little self-promotion. Despite that, just by being there, the atmosphere changes.

Where does this difference come from?

That is,Strength of ego Instead ofWeak sense of self come from.

When there is no self to read

Usually, when we interact with others, we read their "ego" and adjust ourselves accordingly. We read signals like "This person wants to be seen this way" or "This person wants to be treated this way" and respond.

However, when confronting someone with a weak sense of self, we To lose what should be read。

There is no "assertive self" to read. There is no "self-image" to protect. There is no "performance" being projected.

What will we face then?

Something flowing through that person That's right.

This is the true nature of what is called "power."

Charisma and intimidation are "effects of a strong ego," while true power comes from The Effects of a Weak Ego is.

The structure history has shown

Looking back at history, many individuals who left a profound impact possessed this structure.

Gandhi did not hold political power.

Mother Teresa did not flaunt organizational strength.

Dogen did not seek worldly success.

What they have in common is not "a strong ego." Rather,So thin that the ego shone through, and something else passed through it.It might be.

People weren't drawn to their "strength."

Drawn by something, they stood up through them.

The charisma of subtraction

Self-help advice like "acquire charisma" often fails.

Because it aims to "build a strong ego."

True charisma is about the ego To strengthen Instead of,Thin it out stand up

This is a structure that cannot be handled in principle by charisma research in social psychology or by the vocabulary of self-improvement.

Vocabulary that adds strength cannot describe the effect of dilution.

The essence of charisma is not addition but Subtraction is located in

And the attempt to systematically describe that subtraction structure has only just begun.

↓For those who want to know more, check out Chapter III of the Theta Corridor: "Genesis and Transparency" now ↓

↓Murakami's Third Thesis, "Pure and Unblemished Mediation: The Pinnacle of Prayer," is here↓

↓Related articles are here↓

↓ Latest articles are here ↓