Beyond the Difference Between "Intuition" and "Flash of Insight" — The Story of How Action Precedes Awareness
- What is the difference between the two?
- Active thinking and its inversion
- "Occurrence" as a structural phenomenon
- Thinking is not just about retrieving information.
- A mindset of receiving
- The moment you name something, it becomes something else—a label is not an explanation, but a fixing of the field of view.
- The dilemma that people who only do "things that are useful right now" fail to increase in value: One's value is made of the multiplication of scarcity and the reverse calculation of the time horizon on which one is evaluated.
- The very idea of searching for the "right job" is wrong to begin with── Aptitude isn't determined before you enter a job, but after you start doing it.
What is the difference between the two?
In the context of neuroscience, the difference between "intuition" and "inspiration" is organized as follows:
Inspiration is a function of the cerebral cortex, and one can explain the reasons after coming up with it. Intuition is a function of the striatum, and one can vaguely feel convinced without knowing the reason.
Of course, this is a scientifically sound organization from a neuroscience perspective, but as long as we talk about this difference as a difference in brain regions, we will miss more important commonalities.
What both parties have in common is that awareness does not precede action.
Active thinking and its inversion
Something is already completed before the subject turns its attention to it.
Under normal active thinking, the order is as follows.
The subject directs its intention towards "thinking about this." The object then appears in response to that intention. The intention precedes the apprehension of the object.
However, in intuition and flashes of insight, this order is reversed.
Before the subject consciously directs its intention to "think of this," something is already emerging. And after the emergence is complete, one realizes, "this was emerging." Awareness is not the beginning of emergence, but a retrospective cognition of its completion.
"Occurrence" as a structural phenomenon
Intuition and inspiration are merely different manifestations of the same phenomenon.
This ex post facto structure is not just about intuition and inspiration.
The answer to a long-pondered problem suddenly comes to me while I'm doing something else. An unexpected word pops into my head mid-sentence. A direction I was struggling with becomes clear without me realizing it.
What is happening in these situations is all the same structure. The setup occurs first, and awareness recognizes it later.
This structural phenomenon is called an "occurrence." Intuition and inspiration can be positioned as different manifestations of occurrences.
Thinking is not just about retrieving information.
The moment it loosened, it came from the other side.
What happens teaches us something important. It is that not all thinking is active retrieval.
We think of thinking as "taking things out." That's why we try to "think harder" or "concentrate more."
However, many truly decisive insights do not result from active retrieval. They arrive from the other side the moment we relax our posture of trying to retrieve them.
Many experiences where you feel you've "come up with an answer after deep thought" might actually just be a case of "a solution being completed elsewhere while you were thinking."
A mindset of receiving
Receive what has arrived.
When discussing the difference between intuition and inspiration, neuroscience categorizes both as "different ways of coming up with ideas."
However, phenomenologically speaking, there is a deeper common structure to both. It is a structure where something is already completed prior to the subject's activity.
Thinking is not just about taking things out.
To receive what has arrived is also to accept it.
Intuition and inspiration are merely different manifestations of how they are received.
↓Murakami's Second Paper, "A Structural Theory of Origins," is here↓
↓Related articles are here↓
↓ Latest articles are here ↓
-
The moment you name something, it becomes something else—a label is not an explanation, but a fixing of the field of view.
Haven't you ever definitively said, "That person is this kind of person"? People name someone many times a day. That person is a person of self-preservation...
-
The dilemma that people who only do "things that are useful right now" fail to increase in value: One's value is made of the multiplication of scarcity and the reverse calculation of the time horizon on which one is evaluated.
When people think, "I want to increase my value," many first consider getting a certification, honing their expertise, or learning skills that are immediately useful...
-
The very idea of searching for the "right job" is wrong to begin with── Aptitude isn't determined before you enter a job, but after you start doing it.
I took the career aptitude test three times. All three times, a different job category came up. None of them felt right. I read a self-analysis book and took an inventory of my past experiences...
