What's the difference between someone who is intelligent and someone who is profound as a person – abstraction and perspective
There are people in the world who have quick minds.
I can instantly grasp the structure of things, articulate their essence, and simplify complex problems. Others say I'm "smart."
On the other hand, there are people whose words carry weight, even if they might know less. They naturally see things from others' perspectives and speak about matters with an all-encompassing view. Those around them say, "They are deep as a person."
These two are similar, yet completely different abilities.
- Why are "being intelligent" and "being a deep person" different things?
- The ability to discern structure and the power to embrace the world.
- Abstraction alone makes people cold.
- Where pure intellect, devoid of emotion, ends up
- Without a point of view, you can't keep up with reality.
- Inclusiveness and execution ability should be developed on separate axes.
- Know yourself in the four quadrants.
- "Emergent Integration": What does it mean to raise both simultaneously?
- What is Branding? The Concept of “Information Space Design,” Which Holds the Most Value in the Age of the Individual
- Murakumo's first paper, "Extended Imaginary Theory," has finally been released!
- The crucial difference between people who make money and those who don't: The invisible structure of the "information gap" that effort alone cannot overcome.
The former possesses "abstraction." The power of intelligence to discern the underlying structure of things.
The latter has "perspective." The position of consciousness from which one views the world.
Abstraction is the "power to think deeply." Perspective is the "power to see broadly."
As abstraction increases, the mechanisms of things become visible. As perspective rises, the connections between people and the world become visible.
In other words, abstractness is intelligence, and perspective is consciousness. These two are independent axes, and having one doesn't necessarily mean the other is also high.
Why are "being intelligent" and "being a deep person" different things?
The ability to discern structure and the power to embrace the world.
Here's an interesting problem.
If it's too abstract, people will become cold. You can see the structure, but you eliminate emotion. You can definitively say, "Love is an evolutionary adaptive behavior." You can define it as, "A friend is a similarity in the rate of change during growth." Logically, it's correct. But there's no humanity in it.
This is because "emotion," which is most important to humans, is stripped away in the process of abstraction. Empathy declines, relationships become functional, and an intelligence that lacks a certain depth is completed.
Conversely, having only a high viewpoint can delay responses to reality. You can see the big picture, but lack the ability to solve immediate, concrete problems. You have breadth of vision, but lack executive power.
The ideal is to raise both simultaneously, understanding the structure while encompassing people and the world.
Abstraction alone makes people cold.
Where pure intellect, devoid of emotion, ends up
Highly abstract individuals are often insensitive to the emotions of others. This is not out of malice. It's simply that their thought processes are optimized for "structuring," making it difficult to process non-linear information like emotions.
Some people say, "I don't understand why you'd be hurt by something like that." It's not that they don't understand; it's that the circuitry for that simply hasn't developed. Their intellect is sharp, but their emotional resolution is low.
This is not a flaw. It's just a bias. And biases can be fixed once you notice them.
Intelligence stripped of emotion is excellent as a tool, but it's difficult for it to possess depth as a human. This is because fundamental human activities are driven by emotion, not logic.
Without a point of view, you can't keep up with reality.
Inclusiveness and execution ability should be developed on separate axes.
On the other hand, those with a high perspective have a different pitfall. Because they can see the big picture too well, they tend to let things slide with a "Oh well, it's fine."
From a big-picture perspective, minor frictions may seem insignificant. However, real-life relationships and organizations operate on the accumulation of these small frictions. While "not sweating the small stuff" might appear virtuous, in reality, it could simply mean losing touch with the ground truth.
Having a high perspective doesn't mean transcending reality. It's the ability to embrace reality more broadly. Therefore, a high perspective only functions when combined with the ability to act.
Know yourself in the four quadrants.
"Emergent Integration": What does it mean to raise both simultaneously?
When you create a matrix of abstraction and viewpoint, people are divided into four quadrants.
Both are low: "Phenomenon Immersion Type." Only abstraction is high: "Theory-Centric Type." Only perspective is high: "Practice Overview Type." And both are high: "Emergent Integration Type."
Knowing which quadrant you're in right now is the first step. And the path from each quadrant to the next stage clearly exists.
To gain both intelligence and depth as a human being, the first necessity is the recognition that these two are distinct.
To raise your perspective and level of abstraction, check out "Theta Corridor" now!

If you've read the article on "Perspective and Abstraction," we also recommend the following article:
↓ Latest articles are here ↓
-
What is Branding? The Concept of “Information Space Design,” Which Holds the Most Value in the Age of the Individual
The essence of personal branding is design, not decoration. I've always felt uncomfortable with the word "branding." What's often talked about...
-
Murakumo's first paper, "Extended Imaginary Theory," has finally been released!
Finally, Sounuki's first paper, "Extended Imaginary Theory," has been published on an important European paper site. So far, Sounuki has been...
-
The crucial difference between people who make money and those who don't: The invisible structure of the "information gap" that effort alone cannot overcome.
The difference between people who make money and those who don't isn't a difference in ability. It's not a difference in the amount of effort either. "You can't make money if you don't have money" - this...


